Subhash Fakirchand Jain v. State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anticipatory Bail Application No. 465 of 2025 Sarita Brijmohan Singh ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra
...Respondents
with Sunny Dharamchand Chordiya ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
...Respondents
with Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:
2025.06.26 14:53:14 +0530 Interim Application No. 556 of 2025 MAMTA AMAR KALE Subash Fakirchand Jain ... Intervenor In the matter between Sunny Dharamchand Chordiya ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
with Sujata Nitin Chordiya and Anr.
... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
with Interim Application No. 337 of 2025
Subash Fakirchand Jain ... Intervenor In the matter between Sujata Nitin Chordiya and Anr.
... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
with Interim Application No. 1267 of 2025 Sujata Nitin Chordiya and Anr.
... Applicants versus The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
---- Ms Arundhati Garad, for the Applicant in ABA/465/2025. Mr Krishna Holambe Patil, for the Applicant in ABA/250/2025. Dr Shirish Gadge i/b Mr Rutwik Gadge, for the Applicant in ABA/3101/2024 & IA/1267/2025.
Mr Kuldeep Nikam i/b Mr Om Latpate, for the Intervenor in ABA/250/2025 & ABA/3101/2024.
Mr Prashant Jadhav a/w Mr Pankaj Deokar, APP, for Respondent / State.
HC N P Sudrik, Shirur Police Station, Pune Gramin, is present. ---- Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
Date: 26 June 2025
P.C.:
Interim Application No. 337 of 2025 .
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the intervention application and no objection from the other side, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
The interim application stands disposed of accordingly. .
Heard.
The applicants to implead the intervenors as party respondent to this application. Necessary amendment shall be carried out within one week from today.
The learned APP seeks three weeks time to file reply affidavit.
4.
5.
Interim Application No. 556 of 2025 .
Heard.
For the reasons stated in the intervention application and no objection from the other side, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
The interim application stands disposed of accordingly. .
Heard.
The applicants to implead the intervenors as party respondent to this application. Necessary amendment shall be carried out within one week from today.
The learned APP seeks three weeks time to file reply affidavit.
4.
5.
Interim Application No. 1267 of 2025 .
Heard.
Liberty to file the compilation of documents. The interim application stands disposed of accordingly. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 465 of 2025 .
The learned APP seeks three weeks time to file reply affidavit.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)