Vitthal Tukaram Pawar And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra

502-APEAL-176-2025.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 176 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 710 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 176 OF 2025 Vitthal Tukaram Pawar and Anr.

.... Appellants / Applicants

Versus

by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2025.04.02 10:52:08 +0530 The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM ----- Mr. Ajit Hon, Advocate for the Appellants/Applicants. Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP, for the Respondent - State. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 28th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on production board.

2.

This matter is moved for speaking to the minutes of order dated 21st March, 2025.

3.

Learned counsel for the Appellants/Applicants submits that this Court has passed the order on 21st March, 2025 but inadvertently in the said order the appearance fo the some other Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2

502-APEAL-176-2025.doc Advocate is wrongly mentioned. Hence, requested to correct appearance by inserting his name.

4.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Appellants/Applicants, the name of the Advocate be corrected accordingly, and corrected order be uploaded on the official website. 5.

In view of the above, the praecipe stands disposed of. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2