Gunjan Bhisham Bhatia v. State Of Maharashtra

1/3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.02.24 13:04:06 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 713 OF 2025 (NOT ON BOARD) IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 449 OF 2025 Gunjan Bhisham Bhatia ..... Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Ms.Krishna @ Krishika Ashok Chawla ..... Applicant

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 714 OF 2025 (NOT ON BOARD) IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 459 OF 2025 Gunjan Bhisham Bhatia ..... Intervener

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Ms.Hitika Bunty Chawla ..... Applicant

VERSUS

State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent Mr. Arjun B. Jeswani for the Intervener in both IAs. Mr. Bharat V. Bhatia a/w. Ms.Pradnya Sonawane for the Applicants in both ABA.

Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, A.P.P. for the State in ABA/449/2025.

2/3 Mr. Nitin B. Patil, A.P.P. for the State in ABA/459/2025. Mr. Vikram Gaud, PI, Vitthalwadi Police Station present. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 20th FEBRUARY, 2025 P.C. :- These interim applications are filed by the first informant, seeking intervention in the anticipatory bail application. 2.

The advocate appearing for the applicant in both anticipatory bail applications and the learned A.P.P. has no objection if the interim application is allowed. 3.

Both the interim application are allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Copy of the anticipatory bail application be served on the advocate appearing for the first informant.

3/3 5.

If the first informant desires to file any reply to the anticipatory bail application, the same to be done within a period of one week.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]