Rajan Chandraprakash Pandey @ Durgesh Pandey v. State Of Maharashtra

34-ba621-2025 with ia718-2025.doc AGK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.621 OF 2025 Vinod @ Lankesh Munnilal Rajbhar ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.718 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.621 OF 2025 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Rajan Chandraprakash Pandey @ Durgesh Pandey ... Applicant In the matter between Vinod @ Lankesh Munnilal Rajbhar ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent by ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2025.08.01 17:15:21 +0530 Mr. Shyam B Rajbhar for the applicant in BA.

Mr. Tuushar Sonawane for the intervenor-applicant in IA.

Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, APP for the respondent-State. Mr. Rajendra Ghangle, PSI, Bhayandar Police Station, is present.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : AUGUST 1, 2025 P.C.:

1.

This is a bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The matter was taken up for hearing. Learned Advocate appearing for the applicant

34-ba621-2025 with ia718-2025.doc made submissions in support of the prayer for grant of bail. However, after hearing the submissions and upon a prima facie consideration of the material on record, this Court was not inclined to grant the relief as prayed.

2.

At this stage, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application. The request was made with an understanding of the consequences of such withdrawal.

3.

In view of the above, the present bail application is allowed to be withdrawn.

4.

In view of withdrawal of the bail application, interim application does not survive and the same stands disposed of as infructuous.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)