Deepak Omprakash Gupta v. The State Of Maharashtra

3-IA-785-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

MJ Jadhav CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2010 OF 2015 Deepak Omprakash Gupta ... Applicant Vs.

Digitally signed by MANGALTAI JAYWANT JADHAV Date:

2025.09.02 18:09:19 +0530 The State Of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents MANGALTAI JAYWANT JADHAV Mr. Pradeep Yadav for the Applicant.

Mr. K. C. Shinde, APP for the State.

Mr. Vivek S. Sawant for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Sameer Wagh, API, EOW, Mumbai, Present.

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATED : 25th AUGUST 2025 ORDER:

1.

This application is filed for various reliefs which cannot be entertained as an application for modification of bail conditions. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant orally submits that he needs extension of time to comply with the undertaking as even today, according to the applicant, an amount of Rs. 10 Lakhs is still not paid.

3.

Learned APP points out that earlier also extension was granted on one occasion. He points out that on 4th December 2024, Page no. 1 of 2

3-IA-785-2025.doc the application for extension of time was rejected. While rejecting the prayer for extension, this Court observed that despite having flouted the bail conditions no proceeding were initiated for cancellation of bail granted to the applicant. 4.

The applicant is granted bail on 30th March 2016. While granting bail, the applicant had given an undertaking that he shall deposit an amount of Rs. 80 Lakhs within three months from the date of his release. Though, some amount is deposited, the condition is not yet complied in its true letter and spirit. Hence, I see no reason to entertain this application which makes various prayers, apart from making an application to cancel the non-bailable w arrant issued by the trial Court.

5.

Since the earlier application for extension of time is already rejected by this Court on 4th December 2024, I see no reason to entertain any of the prayers in this application. 6.

The Interim Application is, therefore, rejected. (GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 2 of 2