Pratibha Gangadhar Mehetre v. State Of Maharashtra

46-IA-983-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 983 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2025 Pratibha Gangadhar Mehetre ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :

Vishwanath @ Bablu Dagdu Ahire ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Mr. Jayendra D. Khairnar, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Mahendra N. Sandhyanshiv (Through VC), learned Advocate for the Applicant/Intervenor.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

21st JULY 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Mahendra Sandhyanshiv, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Intervenor, Mr. Jayendra Khairnar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

2.

By the present Application, the Intervenor is seeking intervention in Criminal Bail Application No. 221 of 2025. 3.

Mr. Jayendra Khairnar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent Gitalaxmi

46-IA-983-2025.doc do not object to the request made in the intervention application. 4.

In view of the no objection and the statements made by the Intervenor, who claimed to the sister of deceased, in the Application, intervention application is allowed. The Intervenor is permitted to intervene in the abovesaid Bail Application. 5.

Interim Application No. 983 of 2025 is disposed of in the abovesaid terms.

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2025.07.22 13:29:19 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Gitalaxmi