Xyz v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

71.IA.1025.2025.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1025 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.396 OF 2024 XYZ .. Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Sarfaraz Jaffar Ahsan @ Amar Khanna .. Original Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Omkar Mulekar, Advocate for Applicant.

 Ms. Ketaki Jadhav, Advocate i/by Nitin Sejpal for original Applicant.

 Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for Respondent. ...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 03, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Mulekar, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Jadhav, learned Advocate for original Applicant and Ms. Ganapathy, learned APP for Respondent.

2.

Mr. Mulekar would persuade the Court to consider to put an embargo on Applicant in view of condition in bail order dated 27.02.2025 requiring original Applicant to not re-associate with the victim prosecutrix in any manner or to make any attempt to harass her through any medium.

3.

The ground in the Application is that victim expresses apprehension that original Applicant may take aid of social media or

71.IA.1025.2025.doc any other such medium to re-associate with her and / or attempt to create hurdles or malign her during pendency of the trial. 4.

Original Applicant has been served and Ms. Jadhav, learned Advocate appears for him. She would submit that she has obtained instructions and according to instructions received by her she would submit that the original Applicant has absolutely no objection whatsoever to the grant of Interim Application. Hence the apprehension which has been expressed by present Applicant stands addressed. It is directed that in view of condition No.(viii) in the bail order the original Applicant shall not do any such thing which is being apprehended by the victim as stated in her Application until the completion of trial.

5.

The submission made on behalf of original Applicant is noted by the Court which in the opinion of this Court would prima facie suffice. If there is any dereliction observed by the victim, liberty is given to the victim to approach this Court for seeking directions from this Court in accordance with law.

6.

With such liberty, Application stands disposed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date:

2025.04.05 11:32:11 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT