Altaf Mohammed Shaikh v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Shubhada S Kadam 88-IA-1173-2025 (CR)-Corrected.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1173 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 239 OF 2024 Altaf Mohammed Shaikh ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.... Respondents Ms. Ruby Shaikh along with Mr. Imran Shaikh, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Pankaj P. Deokar, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2025.06.21 10:59:08 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM DATE : 30th APRIL, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent No.1-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that as per the observations of this Court in order dated 8th April 2024, the applicant has filed application before the trial court for modification of the order but the trial court has not decided the said application, hence, direction be given to the trial court to decide the said application. This order is corrected as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 19th June 2025 1/2

Shubhada S Kadam 88-IA-1173-2025 (CR)-Corrected.doc 3.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP, I pass following order :

O R D E R

1.

The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). 2.

The trial court is directed to decide the application filed by the applicant for modification of the order on its own merit as early as possible.

The interim application stands disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) This order is corrected as per speaking to the minutes of order dated 19th June 2025 2/2