Santosh Shantaram Naik v. Suhani Santosh Naik

1/1 911 cri. ia 1548 of 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1548 OF 2025 IN CRI. REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO.8462 OF 2025 Santosh Shantaram Naik .... Applicant

Versus

Suhani Santosh Naik and Anr.

.... Respondents .....

Mr.Vaibhav P. Punekar a/w. Asma Shaikh and Mr.Kunal D. Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr.Vijay Thakur a/w. Mr.Ajay Thakur and Tanmay T. Jadhav, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Mr.Avinash D. Kamkhedkar, APP Respondent No.2-State. .....

CORAM

: MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

DATED : 20.06.2025 P.C. :

The learned advocate appearing for the Applicant after hearing for some time is unable to point out the reason for condoning the delay in the Application. The Applicant seeks leave to amend in order to incorporate appropriate grounds for condoning the delay which has occurred in filing the Criminal Revision Application. Leave is granted. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today.

Digitally signed by RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER Date:

2025.06.25 15:22:34 +0530 RAJESHRI PRAKASH AHER List the matter on 11.07.2025.

(MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.) Rajeshri Aher