Santosh Shantaram Naik v. Suhani Santosh Naik

905 IA 1548.25 IN REVN ST 8462.25.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1548 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (ST.) NO.8462 OF 2025 Mr. Santosh Shantaram Naik ...Applicant

Versus

Suhani Santosh Naik & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Vaibhav P. Punekar, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Vijay Thakur a/w Mr. Ajay Thakur i/by Thakur & Associates, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

Ms. Poonam P. Bhosale, APP for the State.

CORAM:

MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED :

29th July 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Punekar, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant, Mr. Thakur, learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.1 and Ms. Bhosale, learned APP for State.

2.

The relief sought in the Interim Application is for condonation of delay of 180 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application.

Dusane

905 IA 1548.25 IN REVN ST 8462.25.DOC 3.

Although the learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 strongly opposes the Application, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.

The Interim Application is disposed of in above terms, with no order as to costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Dusane