Chandrabai Dattu Chaudhari v. State Of Maharashtra

14-ba889-2025 with ia1631-2025.doc AGK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.889 OF 2025 Hitesh Sanjay Nakwan @ Nakwal ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1631 OF 2025 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.889 OF 2025 ATUL GANESH KULKARNI Date: 2025.07.15 17:31:21 +0530 Chandrabai Dattu Chaudhari ... Applicant In the matter between Hitesh Sanjay Nakwan @ Nakwal ... Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms. Gayatri Yadav for the applicant.

Mr. Raju Suryawanshi for the intervenor/applicant in IA.

Mrs. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for the respondentState.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : JULY 15, 2025 P.C.:

1.

This is a bail application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The matter was taken up for hearing. Learned Advocate appearing for the applicant made submissions in support of the prayer for grant of bail. However, after hearing the submissions and upon a prima facie

14-ba889-2025 with ia1631-2025.doc consideration of the material on record, this Court was not inclined to grant the relief as prayed.

2.

At this stage, learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to file fresh application after one year. The request was made with an understanding of the consequences of such withdrawal.

3.

In view of the above, the present bail application is allowed to be withdrawn.

4.

However, the applicant shall be at liberty to renew the request for bail after a period of one year in the event trial is not completed during that period.

5.

The interim application does not survive and is disposed of as infructuous.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)