Rajendra Kumar Saraogi v. The CBI Acb Mumbai And ANR

26. IA 1765 of 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1765 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1678 OF2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1025 OF 2017 Rajendra Kumar Saraogi s/o Late Ramnival Saraogi ...Applicant Vs.

1. The CBI, ACB, Mumbai.

2. The State of Maharashtra

...Respondents

***** Adv. Yogini Abhay Ugale i/by Adv. V. N. Shingnapurkar Advocate for the Applicant Mr. H. J. Dedhia APP for the Respondent No. 2State Adv. Kuldeep S. Patil a/w Adv.

Sampada S. Patil Advocate for the Respondent No.

1- CBI ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

26th JUNE 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned Advocate for CBI.

by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.06.30 14:55:57 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Seema 1/2

26. IA 1765 of 2025.doc 2.

It is true that this Court, as per Order dated 17.01.2018, has suspended the substantive sentence of imprisonment and directed the Applicant to furnish a Personal bond and Surety bond of Rs. 15,000/-. The same is also furnished.

3.

Now, the Surety-Rakesh Chaurasiya is facing difficulty in continuing as surety, and that is why the present Application is for furnishing a new Surety.

4.

Furnishing Surety has its own purpose. It will be useful in case the Appellant will not appear in the future. There is no opposition in the application. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause '(a)' and four weeks time is granted to furnish a new Surety. 5.

Interim Application No. 1765 of 2025 is disposed of accordingly.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2