Mahadev Pandurang Sanas v. Ashok Tanaji Chavan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 247 OF 2025 Mahadev Pandurang Sanas .....Petitioner Vs.

Ashok Tanaji Chavan .....Respondent WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2004 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLN. NO. 247 OF 2025 Mahadev Pandurang Sanas ......Applicant Vs.

Ashok Tanaji Chavan ..........Respondent .....

None for the Applicant.

Mr. Kalpesh U. Patil, for the Respondent No.1 Mr. S. V. Gavand, APP for the Respondent-State. .....

CORAM: MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.

DATED: 12th JUNE 2026 P.C.:- 1.

The present Revision Application has been preferred by the Applicant challenging the judgment and order passed by the learned Sessions Court whereby the conviction recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gadhinglaj, came to be confirmed. It is further submitted that, as the Applicant remained absent before 1/3

the Appellate Court, the Appellate Court directed the learned JMFC, Gadhinglaj, to issue a conviction warrant against the Applicant. 2.

It appears from the record that, since the filing of the present Revision Application, the Applicant has remained continuously absent before this Court. The sentence imposed upon the Applicant has not been suspended. It further appears that the Applicant has not been taken into custody till date, as the conviction warrant has not yet been issued. The Respondent is personally present before this Court, having learnt about the pendency of the present Revision Application through the Court website. The record further reveals that the Applicant has not remained present before this Court since the year 2025.

3.

In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present Revision Application. The Revision Application is accordingly dismissed.

4.

Learned JMFC, Gadhinglaj, is directed to forthwith issue a conviction warrant and take necessary steps to secure the custody of the Applicant in accordance with law.

2/3

4.

The Revision Application stands disposed of in the above terms. Consequently, the Interim Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.) 3/3