Fahd Abutalib Sayed v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AS:24364-DB DDR 1. IA 2030-25 & ANR..doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2030 OF 2025 IN INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2031 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 52 OF 2019 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2031 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 52 OF 2019 Fahd Abutalib Sayed & Ors.

..Applicants In Fahd Abutalib Sayed & Ors.

..Applicants/Org. Accused Vs.

The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents _______________________________ Ms. Sunita Banis Stephen for Applicants.

Smt. Savita M. Yadav, APP for Respondent No.1-State. _______________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 16th JUNE, 2025.

1/2

DDR 1. IA 2030-25 & ANR..doc P.C.:- 1.

As there is no plausible explanation offered by Applicants for condonation of an inordinate and colossal delay of 592 days, learned Advocate for Applicants, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw Interim Application No.2030 of 2025 and Interim Application No.2031 of 2025 unconditionally.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Both Interim Applications are disposed off as withdrawn. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2 Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/06/2025 16:47:04