← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2226/2025allowed

Suresh Raghunath Dhage And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra

2025-06-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2025 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2226 OF 2025 Suresh Raghunath Dhage And Ors.

...Appellants Vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***** Adv. Pratik Kalantri a/w Adv. Mihir N. Kasliwal and Adv. Deepali Kajat Advocate for the Appellants Mr. C. D. Mali APP for the Respondent-State ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

30th JUNE 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Appellants.

2.

Appellants have been convicted for an offence punishable under Sections 20(b) and 22(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. On each of them, there is sentence of rigorous by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2025.07.02 18:36:52 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR 1/3

imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs 5,000/-. If fine is not paid to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. 3.

The contention is Police witnesses are examined and independent witnesses like panch is not examined. There is also grievance about non-compliance of the procedure as per the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

4.

Admit the Appeal.

5.

Call record and proceedings .

6.

Learned APP waives notice for the Respondent-State. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2226 OF 2025 7.

Heard leaned Advocate for the Applicants/Appellants on the point of the suspension of the sentence. Learned APP pointed out certain defects in the application. They are :- (a) There is no prayer for suspension in the prayer clause; (there is only prayer for bail) (b) Copy of the fine payment receipt is not annexed. (c) Copy of the suspension order passed by the trial Court is not annexed.

8.

Learned Advocate for the Applicants seeks time to take instructions about payment of fine and to produce suspension order 2/3

passed by the trial Court.

9.

Let the Applicants/Appellants to amend prayer clause by incorporating the prayer for suspension of sentence. 10.

Amendment be carried out earlier to the next date. 11.

Relying on that, the substantive sentence suspended by the trial Court is suspended till the next date by continuing the same Personal bond and Surety bond, to be furnished within four weeks. 12.

The order of the suspension be produced on the next date positively. If not produced, this order will not continue. 13.

The amount of the bail bond will be decided on the next date. 14.

Stand over to 28th July 2025.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] 3/3