Satish Vijay Shevale v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

98-APEAL(ST)-13241-2025 (CR).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL(ST) NO. 13241 OF 2025 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2372 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL(ST) NO. 13241 OF 2025 Satish Vijay Shevale ...Appellant

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Sanjeev Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. Varsha Thorat, Mr. aarya V. Ambulkar i/by Mr. Prashant Raul, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Anand Subhash Shalgaonkar, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Saniya Patki, Advocate for Respondent No.2. .....

CORAM

:

SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE :

12th DECEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Heard learned counsel for Appellant, learned APP for the Respondent-State and learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the appellant is behind bar for more than three years. The charge is framed in January-2023, but thereafter no witnesses is examined. 3.

It is very serious that the appellants are behind bar for more than three years and charge is framed in the month of January-2023 i.e. around three years and no witnesses is examined. Digitally signed by SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

2025.12.16 11:43:05 +0530 SAJAKALI LIYAKAT JAMADAR Sajakali Jamadar

98-APEAL(ST)-13241-2025 (CR).DOC 4.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Appellant, call the report from concerned Judge as to why there is no progress in trial after framing of charge.

5.

Registrar Judicial to call the report from the concerned Judge by next date.

6.

Stand over to 9th January, 2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Sajakali Jamadar