Irfan Jalalkhan Aalmel v. The State Of Maharashtra

19-IA-2910-2025.doc by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date:

2025.08.11 14:54:43 +0530 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2910 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.288 OF 2025 Irfan Jalalkhan Aalmel ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

***** Adv. Karma Vivan a/w Tejas Kothalikar, Isha Singh, Neel Paralikar Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. N.B. Patil APP for State.

PSI A.K. Mulla, Talegaon Dabhade Police Station. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE : 7 AUGUST 2025 P. C. :- 1.

Today the matter is fixed for hearing the Interim Application for suspension of sentence of this applicant. On more than one occasion, learned Advocate for the applicant submitted that revision is admitted. Admission of revision is one thing and deciding the suspension application is another thing. While deciding the suspension application, the Court needs to see what are the findings by the two Pallavi 1/2

19-IA-2910-2025.doc Courts below. The Court has to see whether the applicant was in jail for the entire period or on bail. Today, a fixed matter is kept, so it is not possible to take up this matter.

2.

Stand over to 29 August 2025.

3.

Even learned APP should be conscious of the fact that there is a difference in between appeal and revision. In case of appeal, there is a full scope for appreciation of evidence whereas, it is not so in case of revision.

4.

With this view in mind, let the learned APP to go through the papers and apprise the Court on the next date. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Pallavi 2/2