Krushna Rajendra Gosavi v. The State Of Maharashtra

7-IA-2940-2025-IN-APEALST-15989-2025.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2940 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 15989 OF 2025 Krushna Rajendra Gosavi ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Krushna Rajendra Gosavi ...Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr Abhishek Kulkarni, with Sagar Wakale & RS Pere, for the Applicant.

Ms Pallavi N Dabholkar, APP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM:

SUMAN SHYAM & SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE DATED:

12TH AUGUST 2025.

PC:- by SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2025.08.12 14:17:04 +0530 1.

Heard.

2.

This Interim Application has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, with a prayer to condone the delay of 39 days in filing the Appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 11th March 2025, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, District-Nashik.

12th August 2025

7-IA-2940-2025-IN-APEALST-15989-2025.DOC 3.

We have perused the explanation for delay furnished in the application. Also considered the arguments addressed by the both sides. Learned APP states that she does not have any instructions to file any objection opposing the Application for delay condonation. Taking note of such explanation and being conscious of the fact that the Applicant has a statutory right to prefer the Appeal against the judgment of conviction, we are inclined to condone the delay.

4.

Delay of 39 day is, therefore, condoned.

5.

Office to register the Appeal.

6.

Interim Application stands disposed of.

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) { 12th August 2025