Raju Iranna Vaidya v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

KSG 2-IA-2947-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2947 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.807 OF 2025 Raju Iranna Vaidya ... Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Anr ... Respondents _______________________________________ None for the Applicant.

Ms. M.H. Mhatre, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Altaf Khan (Appointed Advocate) for the Respondent No.2. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 9th JUNE, 2026 P.C. :

1) Praecipe dated 8th June, 2026, is circulated by the learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2 for speaking to the minutes of Order dated 29th April, 2026. It is stated that, though Mr. Altaf Khan, learned Advocate appointed by High Court Legal Aid Committee to represent Respondent No.2 was in fact present and participated in the hearing of the said Application, his appearance is not recorded in the clause of appearances Digitally signed by KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE Date:

2026.06.15 19:57:08 +0530 KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE in the said Order.

2) Smt. M.H. Mhatre, learned A.P.P. after perusing the record conceded to the fact that, Mr. Altaf Khan was in fact present on 29th April, 2026 and had appeared on behalf of the Respondent No.2. 1/2

KSG 2-IA-2947-2025.doc 3) In view thereof, the appearance of Mr. Altaf Khan appearing for the Respondent No.2 be incorporated in the clause of appearances in the Order dated 29th April, 2026.

4) Order dated 29th April, 2026, be corrected accordingly and a corrected copy of Order be uploaded on the official website of High Court of Bombay.

5) Praecipe dated 8th June, 2026, is disposed off. ( KAMAL KHATA, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2