Atit Deven Shah v. State Of Maharashtra

by ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR Date:

2025.08.25 19:52:40 +0530 ARUNA SANDEEP TALWALKAR 64.IA3050-3048.2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3050 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2606 OF 2025 Atit Deven Shah.

...Applicant.

In the matter between Ravindra Sadashiv Chorge.

...Applicant.

Versus

State of Maharashtra.

...Respondent.

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3048 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2593 OF 2025 Atit Deven Shah.

...Applicant.

In the matter between Rajesh @ Pandit Kamal Agarwal.

...Applicant.

Versus

State of Maharashtra.

...Respondent.

Mr. Siddharth A. Mehta, Ms. Harshada Shrikhande, Mr. Vaibhav Kaushish, Mr. Omkar Khedekar i/b. Mr. Siddharth N. Sutaria, Advocate for the Applicant in BA/2606/2025.

Mr. Vishal V. Rankhambe, a/w. Ms. Aparna V. Rankhambe a/w. Mr. Chaitanya M. Bagul, Mr. Afsar Ansari, Advocate for the Applicant in BA/2593/2025. Mr. T.G. Khan, APP for the Respondent-State.

Mr. Niranjan Mundargi a/w. Ms. Keral Mehta, Advocate for Intervenor in IA/3050/2025 & IA/3048/2025.

API Pravin Kalakhe, ASI Dolas, Pune Crime Branch present. CORAM: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J DATED: 21st AUGUST, 2025 PC:- 1.

Heard Mr. Siddharth Mehta, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 2606 of 2025, Mr. Vishal Rankhambe, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 2593 of 2025, Mr. Mundargi, learned Advocate for the Intervenor and Mr. Khan, learned APP for the State in both the matters.

2.

By the present Applications, the Intervenor is seeking intervention in Bail Application Nos. 2606 of 2025 and Bail Application No. 2593 of 2025, respectively. Intervenor is the original Complainant/Informant. 3.

Mr. Siddharth Mehta, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 2606 of 2025, Mr. Vishal Rankhambe, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 2593 of 2025 and Mr. Khan, learned APP for the State, do not object to the intervention of the Intervener in the bail Applications.

4.

In view of the no objection and considering the statements made in the Intervention Applications, Interim Application No. 3050 of 2025 and Interim Application No. 3048 of 2025 are allowed, thereby permitting the

Intervenor to intervene in the Bail Application No. 2606 of 2025 and Bail Application No. 2593 of 2025.

5.

Both the Interim Applications are disposed of accordingly.. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE,J.)