Rashid Ramjan Ansari v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

36-1-IA-3184-25 In APEAL(ST)-17312-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3184 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.17312 OF 2025 Rashid Ramjan Ansari .... Applicant by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2025.12.04 10:46:08 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE V/s.

State Of Maharashtra And Anr .... Respondents ---- Mr.Rajesh Bhosle, Appointed Advocate, for the Appellant/Applicant.

Mr.Yogesh M. Nakhwa, APP, for Respondent No.1-State. Mr.Yogesh A. Sukale i/b Mr.Aadesh Kondedeshmukh, for Respondent No.2.

---- CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 03rd DECEMBER 2025 P.C:- .

Heard learned counsel for both sides.

2.

The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that, the Accused is in jail and hence his liberty is restricted and which has resulted into causing of the delay in filing of the Appeal in conviction and hence same be condoned.

3.

The learned APP as well as learned counsel for Respondent No.2 vehemently opposed the Application. N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2

36-1-IA-3184-25 In APEAL(ST)-17312-2025.doc 4.

Admittedly, the Appellant is in jail, this would become sufficient ground for condonation of delay. The Application stands allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a). 5.

The Appeal be registered.

(R.M. JOSHI, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2