Tushar Nanasaheb Sonwalkar v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

S.S.Kilaje 28-IA-3455-25-delay.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3455 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL(ST) NO. 18883 OF 2025 Tushar Nanasaheb Sonwalkar ... Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

... Respondent Mr. Om Latpate a/w. Ms. Shraddha S. Khatavkar and Mr. Nagesh Diwate, Advocates for the Applicant.

Mr. Ashok Gawai, App for the State.

Mr. Shailesh Chavan, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

: R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATED : 6th NOVEMBER, 2025.

P.C. :

by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2025.11.07 18:42:25 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE 1.

This application is for condonation of delay of 267 days in filing the Appeal against Judgment and order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati rejecting the application for bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short "Cr.P.C."). 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is in jail and that by itself is a sufficient ground to condone the delay. 3.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and learned APP opposed the application.

4.

This Court finds substance in the contention of learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is in jail, his liberty is curtailed. In such 1/2

S.S.Kilaje 28-IA-3455-25-delay.doc circumstances, delay deserves to be condoned. Accordingly appeal is condoned. Appeal be registered.

5.

Interim Application stands disposed of.

( R. M. JOSHI, J.) 2/2