← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/3910/2025disposed off

Rajeshbhai Gamajabhai Endait v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2025-11-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale2 pages

KSG 65-IA-3910-2025-C.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3910 OF 2025 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO.21318 OF 2025 Rajeshbhai Gamajabhai Endait ... Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Anr ... Respondents _______________________________________ Ms.Ashiwini B. Jadhav i/b Mr. Sham Walve, Appointed Advocate by Legal Aid Committee for the Applicant.

Mr. Ajay S. Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State. _______________________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ.

DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C. :

1) This is an Application for condonation of delay of 9 years and 63 days in preferring an Appeal against conviction. 2) Advocate Ms. Jadhav submitted that, since the date of his arrest KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE the Applicant is behind bars and after the impugned Judgment and Order of KIRAN SANJAY GHUGE Date: 2025.12.03 11:07:21 +0530 conviction is passed by the trial Court he could not prefer the Appeal for want of financial and legal assistance. That, subsequently the Legal Aid Committee, High Court, Mumbai appointed Advocate Sham Walve to represent the Applicant/Appellant. The said Advocate after receipt of necessary papers prepared and filed this Appeal against conviction and an Application for Bail. In this entire process the aforesaid delay has occurred. 1/2

KSG 65-IA-3910-2025-C.doc 3) Learned APP submitted that, necessary Orders in the interest of justice may be passed.

4) In view of the above, for the reasons stated in the Application and in the interest of justice the said delay is condoned and Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

( RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J. ) ( A.S. GADKARI, J. ) 2/2