Metroglobal Limited v. Parag Kunj Finvest Private Limited

1. S-384-2025.odt Amberkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

O.O.C.J.

SUIT NO. 384 OF 2025 Metroglobal Limited .. Plaintiff

Versus

Parag Kunj Finvest Pvt Ltd & Ors.

.. Defendants ....................

 Mr. Naresh Jain a/w Ms. Neha Anchlia, Ms. Priyanshi Jain & Ms. Megha Chavda, Advocates for Plaintiff  Mr. Aamir Qureshi, Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 14, 2026 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Jain, learned Advocate for Plaintiff and Mr. Qureshi, learned Advocate for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3.

2.

Mr. Jain would inform the Court that despite order dated 13.11.2025 having been passed by consent of both the parties, same is breached by Defendant Nos. 1 to 3.

3.

Mr. Qureshi appears for Defendant Nos. 1 to 3. On instructions, he would submit that Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 are ready to comply with their obligations stated in the said order within a period of two weeks from today. The statement made by Mr. Qureshi is recorded and noted by Court. However it is clarified that if Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 do not comply with their obligations in the order dated 13.11.2025, present Suit shall stand automatically revived. The request for injunction

1. S-384-2025.odt which was granted in the Suit proceedings shall be considered on the next date if Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 fail in their obligation. 4.

In the meanwhile Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 shall not deal with any of the suit properties to the detriment of Plaintiff. 5.

Stand over to 28th January, 2026 under the caption "for Compliance".

Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2026.01.14 15:04:11 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR