← Library
Bombay High CourtEP/39/2025disposed off

Rahul Tanaji Kalate v. Shankar Pandurang Jagtap

2025-08-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

7.EP.39.2025.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.) IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ELECTION PETITION NO.39 OF 2025 Rahul S/o Tanaji Kalate .. Petitioner

Versus

Shankar S/o Pandurang Jagtap and Ors.

.. Respondents WITH APPLICATION (L) NO.22753 OF 2025 IN ELECTION PETITION NO.39 OF 2025 ....................

 Mr. Asim Sarode, Advocate appearing through Video Conferencing for Petitioner in Election Petition.

 Mr. Manish Kelkar a/w. Mr. Pratik Irpatgire, Advocates for Respondent No.1 in Election Petition.

 Mr. Arun Panicker, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in Election Petition.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : AUGUST 25, 2025 P.C.

:

1.

Heard learned Advocates appearing for the respective parties.

2.

On 18.08.2025, the following order was passed:- "1.

Heard 2.

Application (L) No. 22753/2025 is filed by Election Commission of India. Affidavit in reply dated 14.08.2025 has been filed by Petitioner in response to the Application.

3.

It is prima facie seen that Petitioner does not have any issue with respect to grant of prayer clause (a), however he has expressed certain reservation regarding grant of prayer clause (c). In that view of the matter, Mr. Panickar, learned Advocate appearing for Election Commission of India is directed to take appropriate instructions and accordingly apprise the Court on the next date of hearing in order to enable this Court to determine the present Petition.

7.EP.39.2025.doc 4.

In the meanwhile, Petitioner is directed to serve copy of the Election Petition on the returned candidate i.e Respondent No. 1 whose Advocate has made a grievance before the Court that he has not been served. Details are given to the Advocate for Petitioner.

5.

Stand over to 25th August, 2025."

3.

Mr. Sarode in his usual fairness informs the Court that he has placed objections only with respect to prayer clauses (c) and (d) in the Interim Application filed by Election Petition. 4.

Mr. Panicker submits that some time be given to him as he has sought instructions with respect to the Affidavit-in-Reply filed by Petitioner.

5.

At his request, stand over to 08th September, 2025. To be placed under the caption 'For passing order in Interim Application'. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2025.08.25 18:25:37 +0530 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT