Rahul Tanaji Kalate v. Shankar Pandurang Jagtap

906_EP_39_2025.docx Prasad Rajput IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY O.O.C.J.

O.O.C.J.

ELECTION PETITION NO.39 OF 2025 Rahul Tanaji Kalate .. Petitioner

Versus

Shankar pandurang jagtap .. Respondent ....................

 Ms. Amita Chaware i/by Amita Chaware Associates, Advocate for Petitioner.

 Ms. Naina Jejeebhoy a/w Mr. Arun Panicker and Mr. Vinay Nair, Advocates for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 22, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Chaware, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Ms. Jejeebhoy, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. 2.

Ms. Jejeebhoy enters appearance on behalf of Respondent Nos.2 and 3. It is seen that order dated 03.03.2025 has not been fully complied in view of remark of Registry dated 04.02.2025. There are certain preliminary submissions made today by learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 which shall be considered on the next adjourned date.

3.

Stand over to 6th May, 2025. To be listed under the caption 'For Directions'.

P.R. Rajput [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]