Prashant Sudam Jagtap v. Chetan Vitthal Tupe

1/1 P2-APLN-35918-2025.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION APPLICATION NO. 35918 OF 2025 IN ELECTION PETITION NO.46 OF 2025 Prashant Sudam Jagtap

...Petitioner

Versus

Chetan Vithal Tupe

...Respondent

_______ Mr. Amey S. Ajgaonkar i/b Asim Sarode, for the Petitioner. _______

CORAM

:

ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

th DECEMBER 2025 DATE :

P.C.

1.

Mentioned. Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

Mr. Ajgaonkar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that notice of this mentioning has been given to the Respondent's Advocates. His statement is accepted. Learned counsel seeks an extension of time to file a reply to the Application filed by the Respondent under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC"). 3.

Time is extended by a period of one week from today. [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav