← Library
Bombay High CourtEP/46/2025rejected

Prashant Sudam Jagtap v. Chetan Vitthal Tupe

2025-11-20Hon'Ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor2 pages

Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date:

2025.11.21 10:51:13 +0530 1/2 17-EP-46-2025 (OS) .doc MEERA MAHESH JADHAV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION ELECTION PETITION NO. 46 OF 2025 Prashant Sudam Jagtap

...Petitioner

Versus

Chetan Vitthal Tupe

...Respondent

----- Mr. Asim Sarode (through VC) Mr. Sumedh Sarode i/b Mr. Asim Sarode for Petitioner.

Mr. Abhiji P. Kulkarni for Respondent.

----- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

th NOVEMBER, 2025.

DATE : 20 P.C:

Mr. Sarode, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner points out that the application filed under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code by the Respondent has not been received by him. Learned Counsel Mr. Kulkarni, appearing on behalf of the Respondent submits that the same has been sent to Mr. Sarode on Whatsapp, however, undertakes to serve hard copy within the course of today.

Mr. Sarode, requests and is granted two weeks time to file affidavit in reply. Rejoinder, if any, to be filed within one week thereafter. Mr. Kulkarni also points out that written statement has also been filed in the registry.

Meera Jadhav

2/2 17-EP-46-2025 (OS) .doc Stand over to 18 th December 2025.

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Meera Jadhav