Manohar B Pillai v. Chief Executive Officer Sra

58 WP 996-25.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION LAXMI SUBHASH SONTAKKE Date: 2025.12.03 17:25:06 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 996 OF 2025 Manohar B. Pillai

...Petitioner

Versus

Chief Executive Officer, SRA & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Ms. Jennifer Sagayaraja for Petitioner.

Mr. Dhruti Kapadia a/w Kavita Dhanuka for Respondent No.1 & 2. _______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

24th NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Leave to amend is granted to implead the SRA Society as a party Respondent.

2.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that no transit rent has been paid to him despite his eligibility and despite his name appearing in Annexure II. Further, although the scheme has been implemented, no alternate accommodation has been allotted to him. Let the grievance of the Petitioner be examined by the Chief Officer of the SRA.

3.

Also on behalf of the SRA, a reply affidavit shall be placed on record. 4.

The reply affidavit shall be filed within ten days from today, which be served on the Petitioner well in advance.

5.

List the proceedings on 8 December 2025 (HOB). Laxmi

58 WP 996-25.DOC 6.

We also clarify that in the event any amounts from the mandatory deposit made by the Developer are available, the Chief Officer shall consider paying the amounts to the Petitioner.

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Laxmi