Prashant Sitaram More v. The Chief Officer Mbrr Board

by PRASHANT VILAS RANE Date:

2025.06.16 12:20:01 +0530 PRASHANT VILAS RANE 20WP-1121-25.DOC PVR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1121 OF 2025 Prashant Sitaram More.

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Chief Officer MBRR Board & Ors.

...Respondents

_________ Mr. Yatin Rasiklal Shah, for Petitioner.

Ms. Aparna Kalathil with Ms. Sayali Apte i/b. P.G. Lad, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 MHADA.

Mr. Swapnil Kulkarni, Dy. Engineer G/N Ward MHADA present. Ms. Nazia Sheikh, AGP for the State-Respondent No.4. __________

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ.

DATE:

13 JUNE 2025.

P.C.

1.

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for the substantive relief that the appeal filed by the petitioner, pending before respondent No.1, be decided expeditiously.

2.

Learned Counsel for respondent No.1, on instructions of the officer who is present in the Court, states that the appeal would be decided within four weeks. 3.

If that be so, further adjudication of the petition is not called for. 4.

Respondent No.1 shall decide the appeal in accordance with law on its own merits, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The appeal be decided within four weeks.

5.

All the contentions of the parties are expressly kept open. 6.

Disposed of in the aforesaid terms. No costs. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)