Zahir Shah M. Ansari v. State Of Maharashtra Through Office Of The Government Pleader

WP-2602-25.DOC JYOTI RAJESH MANE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.11.21 17:28:45 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 2602 OF 2025 Dr. Zahir Shah M. Ansari & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

_______ Mr. Rupesh Dubey i/b. Nilu Mishra, for Petitioners. Mr. Chandra K. Naik, for Respondent No.6.

Mr. Dharmesh Joshi, for Respondent No.7.

_______

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

DATE:

21st NOVEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Not on board. Taken on board on a praecipe moved on behalf of Respondent No.6 for speaking to the minutes of the Order dated 13th October 2025.

2.

Paragraph No.2 of the said order be deleted and corrected as follows:

2. It appears that there is some dispute in regard to Petitioner No.1's occupation in respect of the tenement in question as it is the contention of Petitioner No.1 that the original tenant of the said tenement was the mother of Petitioner No.1. It is contended that the mother of Petitioner No.1 has been granted 3 new flats. Petitioner No.1 appears to have received the possession of the New Flat No.1004 from his mother. He has several grievances against MHADA as also the Municipal Corporation in regard to the construction.

3.

In para No.3 after the words "Respondent No.6 mother" may be replaced with words "Respondent No.6 Developer and Respondent No.7mother". Mane

WP-2602-25.DOC 4.

In para No.4 third line the word "Petitioner" may be replaced with "Petitioner No.1".

5.

The order be corrected accordingly and be made available to the parties. (AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Mane