Jaikishan Manik Ramchandani Alias Jaikishan Manikrai Ramchandani v. Manik Bhagsingh Ramchandani Alias Manik B Ramchandani Alias Manikrai Ramchandani (Deceased No. 1)

1 69.TP/1124/2025 Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 06th May 2025 FOR COMPLIANCE:

69. TP/1224/2025 P. C.

:

Shri. Jayant Wani i/b HUNNURKAR SEEMA SADASHIV Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner (AMH20210053261 C202500016)

1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "IS Act") for the properties left by the deceased, namely (1) Manik Bhagsingh Ramchandani alias Manik B. Ramchandani alias Manikrai Ramchandani and (2) Leela Manik Ramchandani alias Lila M Ramchandani (For short "Said deceased"). The petitioner, namely Jaikishan Manik Ramchandani Alias Jaikishan Manikrai Rarnchandani, has filed documents.

2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as true copy of the death certificates of both the deceased, affidavit with document to dispense with requisition of identity proof of the deceased no. 2 and identity proof of the deceased no. 1, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

3) Said deceased No. 1 died as a married on 09.02.2001 at Mumbai and Deceased No. 2 died as a Widow on 01.04.2009 at Mumbai leaving behind them legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule-I of the petition. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

4) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High

2 69.TP/1124/2025 Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules") and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as uncontested one.

5) Legal heirs of the deceased have consented by way of Affidavits to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. Legal heirs have accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, interse.

6) Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

7) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act 1956, the petitioner, being Son of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

2) The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner's Oath within stipulated period.

3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

06th May 2025 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department