← Library
Bombay High CourtTP/2608/2025grant issued

Rohit Seth Son Of Vijay Seth v. Neha Seth Alias Neha Rohit Seth

2025-08-04Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)3 pages

Before :Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With Testamentary Department Date 04th August, 2025 FOR COMPLIANCE:

81. TP/2608/2025 P.

C. :

Ms. Seema Hunnurkar Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner (AMH2021005326 1C202500038)

1) This is a petition for grant of Letters of Administration, under the Provisions of Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "IS Act") for the properties left by the deceased, namely Neha Seth alias Neha Rohit Seth, (For short "Said deceased"). The petitioner, namely Rohit Seth Son of Vijay Seth, has filed documents.

2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, identity proof of the deceased, oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

3) Said deceased died as a married on 02-10-2021 at Mumbai leaving behind her legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. Deceased left properties shown in the schedule-I of the petition. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

4) Citation was issued, which has been duly affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court(O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules") and an affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of BHC Rules. Till today, no one appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner or nothing is brought to the notice regarding pending litigation pertaining to the same properties. Hence, the petition is

treated as uncontested one.

5) One of the minor Legal heir of the deceased has consented by way of Affidavit filed through her natural guardian who is also petitioner to grant prayer of petitioner to grant a Letters of Administration, without reserving any right. Legal heir has accepted the facts, regarding their relationship, inter-se.

6) The petitioner being birth patent of the minor has filed affidavit. In view of the order passed in the Testamentary Petition No. 1701 of 2017, there is no requisition to justify the share of minor legal heir, namely Miesha Seth as the petitioner is the birth parent of said minor.

7) Petitioner has filed the administration Bond in prescribed form No. 118 with surety.

8) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Husband of the deceased, is entitled to seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by petitioner and heirs of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in prescribed format as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

2) The petitioner to file an account as under taken in a Petitioner's Oath within stipulated period.

3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross Petition is pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed.

04th August, 2025 Officer on Special Duty, with Testamentary Department