Rucha Rajesh Arekar v. Yadav Siddhant Sunil Deceased

1 42.TP/3741/2025 Before: Shri. P. A. Jagdale, Officer on Special Duty, With the Testamentary Department Date 19th January 2026 FOR COMPLIANCE:

42. TP/3741/2025 ) ) ) Ms. Asmita Poojary i/b I V Merchant & Co. Ld. Advocate for the Petitioner (AMH20240131868C2025000 35) P.C.:

1) Petitioner, namely Rucha Rajesh Arekar Alias Rucha Siddhant Yadav, has applied for the grant of Letters of Administration, under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 (for short "IS Act"), for the properties left by the deceased, namely Yadav Siddhant Sunil alias Siddhant Sunil Yadav(For short "Said deceased").

2) I have heard Ld. Advocate. I perused the documents, such as a true copy of the death certificate of the deceased, an identity proof of the deceased, an oath in the prescribed format, affidavit of service citation.

3) Said deceased died as a married on 29-07-2020 at Mumbai leaving behind him legal heirs, shown in the paragraph No. 4 of the petition. Petitioner states that there are no other legal heirs to the deceased, except heirs shown in the petition. The deceased left properties shown in Schedule I of the petition. Mother of the deceased is missing since 1999 namely Mona Yadav, the petitioner has taken out IA(L)/40910/2025 for declaring her as died. Upon hearing, the Hon'ble Court granted the said application vide an order dated 18.11.2025. The delay has been explained vide Rule 382 of the Rules.

4) Office issued Citation to all concern and same has been affixed on the Notice Board of the Hon'ble High Court and notice board of the Collector's Office at Mumbai and 14 days have been expired vide Rule 397(1) and (4) of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980(for short "BHC Rules"). An affidavit to that effect has been filed. Notice to the collector has been issued vide Rule 396 of the BHC Rules. Till today, no one has appeared to resist the claim of the petitioner, nor has anything been brought to the notice regarding pending litigation about the same properties. Hence, the petition is treated as an uncontested one.

5) Ld. Advocate for the petitioner submitted that in view of provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the petitioner, being Widow of the deceased, is entitled to

2 42.TP/3741/2025 seek a Letters of Administration. Hence, facts stated by the petitioner and heir of the deceased, on oath, remained unchallenged and required to be accepted. Accordingly, the petition deserves to be allowed, as prayed for. Hence, following order:

ORDER

1) Petition is allowed and the Letters of Administration be granted to the petitioner for properties, left by the deceased and shown in the schedule, in the prescribed format, having effect throughout the State of Maharashtra as per the provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

2) The petitioner to file an account as undertaken in a Petitioner's Oath within the stipulated period.

3) Before issuance of the grant, the office to verify that there is no cross-petition pending or caveat resisting the petition is filed. 19th January 2026 Officer on Special Duty, with the Testamentary Department