Sunita Suresh Nandoskar And 4 ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS

apn 1-osrpw-16-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.16 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3448 OF 2024 Sunita Suresh Nandoskar & Ors.

... Petitioners.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents.

Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh, a/w Adv. Sahil Salvi and Adv. Manohar Shelar for the Petitioners.

Ms. Gaurangi Patil, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Aseem Naphade, a/w Adv. Saurabh Utangale, Adv. Sarthak Utangale and Adv. Vedant Joshi, i/by Adv. Rohan Sawant for Respondent No.3. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND KAMAL KHATA, JJ.

DATE : 6th August 2025.

Digitally signed by ASHWINI H GAJAKOSH Date:

2025.08.12 12:58:08 +0530 ASHWINI GAJAKOSH P.C.:- 1) Praecipe dated 5th August, 2025 was circulated by the learned Advocate for the Petitioners for Speaking to the Minutes of Order dated 27th June, 2025. In the quotation of paragraph no.7, the words 'Contempt Petition' has been erroneously typed instead of 'Writ Petition'. 1.1) The correct words are 'Writ Petition'.

2) After effecting the said correction, the quotation in paragraph 7 1/2

apn 1-osrpw-16-2025.doc read as under:

"Since the disputes between the parties are pending decision with MHADA, we see no reason to entertain a Writ Petition."

3) The order dated 27th June, 2025 be corrected accordingly and the corrected Order be uploaded on the official website of High Court of Bombay.

4) Praecipe dated 5th August, 2025 is disposed of. (KAMAL KHATA, J.) (A.S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2