Suresh Awate v. Milind Borikar, Vice Chairman And Chief Officer
JYOTI RAJESH MANE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.11.04 19:16:38 +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (L) NO. 28889 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2025 Thalia And Aishwarya Builders
...Petitioners
Versus
Milind Borikar, Vice Chairman & Chief Officer Mumbai Board & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 64 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2025 Suresh Awate and Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
Milind Borikar, Vice Chairman & Chief Officer Mumbai Board & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2025 Nehru Nagar Ajinkyatara CHS Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
The MHADA & Ors.
...Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 28884 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 185 OF 2025 Thalia And Aishwarya Builders ..Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Nehru Nagar Ajinkyatara CHS Ltd.
...Petitioner
Versus
The MHADA & Ors.
...Respondents
_______ Mr. Aniket Malu i/b. Arjun Yadav, Advocate for Petitioner in CONPW/64/205. Mr. Aditya Shirke, Advocate for Applicant in IAL/28884/2025 and for Petitioner in CONPL/28889/2025 and Respondent NO.5 in CONPW/64/2025. Mr. Akshay Shinde, Advocate for MHADA.
Mr. Milind More, Addl. G.P. for State.
Mr. G. S. Hegde, Senior Advocate along with Mr. P.M.Bhansali i/b. Mr. Ajay Khaire , Advocates for MMRDA in CONPWL/28889/25 IN WP/185/25. Mr. Nilesh Pandey along with Mr. Sandip Pal, a/w. Mr. Anirudh Ahire a/w. Mr.Rishab Dubey, Advocates for Respondent No. 7- Nehru Nagar Shraddha Suyog CHS.
_______
CORAM:
G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.
DATE:
4 November 2025 P.C.
1.
The proceedings are today listed for compliance in view of the Order dated 16th October 2025. We are informed by the learned counsel for the Respondent No.7 that the possession is already handed over. What remains is now the implementation of paragraph 4 of the order dated 16th September 2025, passed by this Court directing the Stamp Authorities to take steps. We are informed by Mr. More, learned Addl. GP that appropriate steps in that regard have been taken. 2.
We accordingly record the compliance. In the event the parties have any further grievances, they are at liberty to approach the appropriate authorities, who shall take an appropriate decision in the light of the various orders passed in these proceedings, so as to enable the redevelopment.. 3.
All contentions in that regard are expressly kept open. 4.
Before parting we may also observe that the reference to the 'Electricity Meter' in our order dated 16th October 2025, needs to be in fact the 'Sub Station'. The said order be accordingly corrected.
5.
In the event any application made by the Society are pending consideration of the Competent Authority of the MHADA, let the same be
decided in accordance with law by a reasoned order, so as to facilitate the redevelopment.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)