Manisha Dinesh Parmar v. The Mumbai Municipal Corporation

16-CONPW-102-2025.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 102 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 910 OF 2023 Manisha Dinesh Parmar

...Petitioner

Versus

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation And Ors.

...Respondents

__________ Mr. Devang D. Parmar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Milind More, Addl.G.P. for the State/Respondent No. 3. Ms. Smita V. Tondwalkar i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi, Advocate for the BMC/Respondent.

Mr. Prasad P. Pednekar, AA & C M/W Ward a/w Mrs. Riddhi R. Pawaskar, AA & C 'A' Ward & Mr. Deepak B. Sawant, Ward Insp. 'A' Ward, Officers of BMC present in the Court.

__________ CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE :

8th DECEMBER, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

After the hearing progressed to some extent and the learned Advocate for the Corporation tendered a compilation of documents (26 pages), the learned Advocate for the Petitioner is convinced that there is no contempt. He, therefore, prays for leave to withdraw this Petition so as to avail of a remedy for seeking further documents from the Corporation.

Gitalaxmi

16-CONPW-102-2025.odt 2.

The said compilation is taken on record and collectively marked as "X" for identification.

3.

In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions. If the Petitioner has any grievance about the order passed, he can take recourse to a remedy as is set out in the order of this Court dated 10th July, 2024 in Writ Petition No. 910 of 2023. [ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] [RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.] by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2025.12.11 12:17:42 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Gitalaxmi