Ganesh Ramchandra Naik v. Manohar Krishna Madhavi (M.K.)

1 ep 38 of 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ELECTION PETITION NO.38 OF 2025 Manohar Krishna Madhavi (M.K.) ...

Petitioner versus Ganesh Ramchandra Naik ...

Respondent WITH APPLICATION NO.17 OF 2025 WITH APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2025 Mr. Vikrant Anil Khare with Mr. Siddharth Ingale, Mr. Aniruddh Rote i/by Mr. Asim Sarode, for Petitioner.

Ms. Druti Datar for Respondent and for Applicants. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

19 SEPTEMBER 2025 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks further to file an affidavit in reply to the Interim Application.

3.

By way of final indulgence, two weeks time is granted to file affidavit in reply.

4.

It is hereby made clear that if the affidavit in reply is not filed within the said period of two weeks, the Court shall be constrained to proceed on the premise that the averments in the Interim Application remain uncontroverted. 5.

In the event the affidavit in reply is filed, rejoinder, if any, be filed within one week thereafter.

SSP 1/2

1 ep 38 of 2025.doc 6.

Stand over to 10 October 2025.

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 2/2 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 20/09/2025 11:15:27