Ashok Pahlajrai Rajani v. Manoj Shivnath Puri,

Before : Anil H. Laddhad Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 26th February, 2025 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

19. CHOL/47/2025 IN CTS(L)/11951/2023 ) ) ) Ms. Namrata Agashe i/b. Harsh Anil, Advocate for Applicant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) P.C. : The present e-filed Chamber Order is e-filed by the Applicant for setting aside Order dated 03.12.2024, rejecting captioned Caveat under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections. Ld. Advocate for the Applicant has e-filed Affidavit of Service showing service of Chamber Order upon Respondents / Org. Petitioner. Despite service, today none appeared for Respondents / Org. Petitioner. Heard ld. Advocate for the Applicant. Perused Affidavit in Support of Chamber Order. It is contended therein that Ld. Advocate had taken steps to remove office objections by filing Interim Application for condonation of delay on 18.12.

2024, however, in view of conditional Order dated 03.12.2024, the Caveat got rejected on 17.12.2024. It is further contended that as per Notice dated 16.11.2024, the e-filing portal was inaccessible from 16.12.2024 to 17.12.2024. Ld. Advocate, therefore, prays for restoration of the Caveat by allowing the present Chamber Order.

Reasons mentioned in the Affidavit appear to be genuine and substantial justice cannot be denied on technical grounds. Hence, present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

The Caveator to remove office objections on the Caveat and get the same registered and/or numbered within four weeks from the date of .... 2

.... Continued Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 26th February, 2025 : 2 :

uploading of order, failing Caveat to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

) ) ) Date : 26.02.2025 Prothonotary & Senior Master M.N.

Kadam by M.N. Kadam Date:

2025.02.26 17:53:28 +0530