Salim Ali Mohd Shaikh v. Mariyam Bee Abdul Sattar Abbas

Before : Anil H. Laddhad Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 10th July, 2025 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

) ) ) ) ) Ms. Bhakti Patil i/b. Mr. Mahesh Devlkear, Advocate for Applicant

39. CHOL/292/2025 in TP(L)/25227/2023 P.C. : The present Chamber Order is e-filed by the Applicant for setting aside Order dated 07.03.2025, rejecting captioned Petition under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Heard Ld. Advocate for the Applicant. Perused Affidavit in Support to the Chamber Order. It is contended that the Applicant was in process of removing office objections. However, Advocate on record was diagnosed with Brain Tumor and got admitted in the hospital. In the meantime, vide Order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Authority, the present Petition got rejected. The Applicant, therefore, prays for restoration of the captioned Petition.

Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that she will pursue with the caption Petition diligently, and prays for restoration of the same by condoning delay of 10 days.

The Applicant has annexed documentary proof of health issues of Advocate on record. Hence, reasons mentioned in Affidavit appear to be genuine. Therefore, delay of 10 days caused in filing present Chamber Order is condoned and present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

The Petitioner to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same registered and/or numbered within four weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 10.07.2025 Prothonotary & Senior Master