Farokh K Mistry v. Shobha Mehta

Before : Anil H. Laddhad Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 28th April, 2026 CALLED FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Farokh Mistry, Advocate for Applicant 37.

CHOL/340/2026 IN MPT(L)/16052/2023 P.C. : The present Chamber Order is e-filed by the Applicant for setting aside Order dated 09.05.2025, rejecting captioned Petition under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance of office objections.

Heard Ld. Advocate for the Applicant. Perused Affidavit in support of the Chamber Order. It is contended therein that vide conditional Order dated 09.05.2025, Applicant was directed to remove office objections within four weeks. As the Applicant is a senior citizen and not keeping well, office objections remained to be complied with within time and the matter got rejected. It is further averred in Affidavit in support that due to aforesaid reasons, he could not file Chamber Order within time and hence, delay of 24 days is caused in filing present Chamber Order.

Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that now, he will pursue captioned Petition diligently and therefore, prays that delay of 24 days caused in filing present Chamber Order may be condoned and Chamber Order may be granted.

In view of above, I am of the view that the Applicant has made out a case for restoration of captioned Petition and hence, captioned Chamber Order is granted as prayed by condoning delay of 24 days caused in filing Chamber Order.

The Petitioner to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same registered and/or .... 2

Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 28th April, 2026 .... Continued : 2 :

numbered within two weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

) ) ) ) Date : 28.04.2026 Prothonotary & Senior Master by Kadam M.N.

Date:

2026.05.04 13:39:46 +0530 Kadam M.N.