Sunita Nemani v. Mehulle Vinod Choksi

Before : Anil H. Laddhad Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 23rd September, 2025 FOR DIRECTIONS :

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ms. Rishika Agarwal i/b. Ms. Devyani Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant

12. CHOL/420/2025 IN CTS(L)/35331/2024 P.C. : The present Chamber Order is e-filed by the Applicant for restoration of the Caveat and setting aside Order dated 26.02.2025, rejecting captioned Petition under O.S.Rule 986 for noncompliance of office objections. Affidavit of Service showing service of Chamber Order upon other side is already e-filed.

Heard Ld. Advocate for the Applicant. Perused Affidavit in Support to the Chamber Order. It is contended that the Applicant was in process of removing office objections on Caveat, while further office objections were raised which he could not remove within time and Caveat got rejected. It is further stated that there is delay of 48 days in taking out present Chamber Order.

Ld. Advocate for the Applicant submits that he will pursue with the caption Caveat diligently, and prays for restoration of the same by condoning delay.

Considering reasons, as above, it transpires that the Applicant had made an attempts to remove office objections, and he is in process of removing office objections. Therefore, in my opinion, one opportunity is required to be given to the Applicant to pursue with the captioned Caveat. Therefore, delay of 48 days caused in filing present Chamber Order is condoned and present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

The Caveator to remove office objections on the Caveat and get the same registered and/or ....2

Prothonotary and Senior Master Date : 23rd September, 2025 .... Continued : 2 :

) ) ) ) numbered within four weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing Caveat to stand rejected for non-compliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 23.09.2025 Prothonotary & Senior Master