Gati Limited v. Union Of India

2026:BHC-OS:7213 Diksha Rane 24 CHOL 484 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION 24 CHOL/484/2025 [Original] In EXA(L)/111/2019 GATI LIMITED VS Union of India ------------ Adv. S. P. Kshirsagar i/b. Adv. Dushyant Pagare for applicant. Adv. Gautam Modanwal a/w. Adv. T. J. Pandian, Adv. Prasad Sawant for the respondent.

------------ CORAM :

RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE :

23 MARCH 2026.

P.C. :

1) This Chamber Order has been filed by the decree holder seeking to restore the Execution Application which was dismissed by the order passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master of this Court. 2) Since the office objections were not removed within time, the Execution Application stood dismissed.

3) Mr.Modanwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has opposed this application.

4) Heard learned counsel for the parties and I have gone through the contents of the documents on record, and I am satisfied that this Chamber Order needs to be allowed.

Diksha Rane 24 CHOL 484 2025.doc 5) The Chamber Order stands allowed.

6) Time of four weeks is granted to remove the office objections. 7) If office objections are not removed within four weeks, the Execution Application stands dismissed.

8) All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (Rajesh S. Patil, J.) Signed by: Diksha Rane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 25/03/2026 15:36:35