← Library
Bombay High CourtCHOL/652/2025disposed off

Nitin Ratansey Maskai v. Kamala Ratansey Maskai

2025-12-05Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)2 pages

Before : Anil H. Laddhad, Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 05th December, 2025 FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :

CHOL/652/2025 in IAL/18768/2025 in S/242/2025 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Mr. Manek Kalyaniwalla a/w. Prapti Shetty and Prashant Shetty i/b. TPS Law, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. Aaditya Pandit i/b. Mehta and Padamsey, Advocate for defendant nos. 1 to 12.

Ms. Tejashree Munot i/b. Jaymala Ostwal, Advocate for defendant no. 13.

P.C.:

The present Chamber Order is e-filed by the applicant for setting aside Order dated 06.08.2025, rejecting captioned Interim Application under O.S.Rule 986 for noncompliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Ld. Advocate for the applicant tenders hard copy of Affidavit of Service dated 01.12.2025, which is taken on record. Ld. Advocate made a statement that all defendants have been served with the Chamber Order. Statement is accepted.

None appeared for respondent nos. 14 to 18 despite service.

Heard ld. Advocate for the applicant. Perused Affidavit in Support, contents of which are self-explanatory. It is contended that Advocate on record was engaged in removing office objections on Suit, which is now numbered.

Thereafter, ld. Advocate was busy in issuing Writ of Summons in the matter. It is further contended that office objections on Interim Application were complied with and approved by the department, however, Application was disposed of. It is further contended that inadvertently, delay of 56 days caused in filing Chamber Order, which may be condoned and present Chamber Order may be allowed.

2 Before : Anil H. Laddhad, Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 05th December, 2025 contd....

CHOL/652/2025 in IAL/18768/2025 in S/242/2025 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ld. Advocates for defendant nos. 1 to 13 give no objection for restoration of captioned Interim Application.

Considering grounds raised in Affidavit and no objection of defendant nos. 1 to 13, delay of 56 days caused in filing present Chamber Order is condoned and present Chamber Order is granted as prayed.

The applicant to remove office objections of Interim Application, if any, and get the same registered and/or numbered within four weeks from the date of uploading of order, failing Application to stand rejected for noncompliance of office objections under O.S.Rule 986.

Date : 05.12.2025 Prothonotary and Senior Master Digitally signed by RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA Date:

2025.12.06 10:40:25 +0530 RAJEEV VIJAY ACHARYA