The Official Assignee, High Court, Bombay/Sicom Ltd., v. Chetan Dhanomal Bablani And Others

18-IRN-3-25.doc Sharayu Khot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

IN ITS INSOLVENCY JURISDICTION INSOLVENCY RULE NISI PETITION NO. 3 OF 2025 IN INSOLVENCY PETITION NO. 101 OF 2006 Re: Chetan Dhanomal Bablani & Ors.

...Insolvents Exparte : M/s. Sicom Limited ...Petitioning Creditor And The Official Assignee of Bombay

...Petitioner

---------- Mr. Rohit Jadhav i/by Ms. Sana Khan, for the Petitioning Creditor. Mr. Mayank Bagla a/w Mr. Hiten Lala, Insolvent No. 2. Mr. Mahesh Bablani, Insolvent No. 2 present in person. Mrs. C.J. Bhatt, Official Assignee a/w Mr. Subodh Patil, Deputy O.A., Mr. D.B. Iswalkar, 1st Assistant O.A. present. Mrs. Rekha Rane, Insolvency Registrar present. ---------- CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA J DATE : 17 June 2025 SHARAYU PANDURANG KHOT ORDER :

Digitally signed by SHARAYU PANDURANG KHOT Date:

2025.06.19 18:10:33 +0530 1.

The learned Counsel for the Insolvent No. 2 states that on the very day when the said order dated 15th April 2025 had been passed making Rule Nisi as regards the Insolvent No. 2 absolute, an 1/2

18-IRN-3-25.doc Affidavit had been filed by Insolvent No. 2, which states that the I.T. Returns have not been filed from 1999 and hence, the requisition of the Official Assignee could not be complied with. He has stated that an undertaking shall be filed by Insolvent No. 2 to the effect that the further requisitions of the Official Assignee shall be complied with. 2.

The said undertaking shall be filed by the Insolvent No. 2 with the Official Assignee within a period of one week from the date of this order.

3.

Considering that Insolvent No. 2 has appeared through Counsel and is furnishing the aforementioned undertaking, warrant of arrest is discharged.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] 2/2