Laxmi Dental Export Pvt. Ltd. v. Yogesh Bagul And Others
by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date:
2025.03.06 19:23:50 +0530 MEERA MAHESH JADHAV 1/2 5-crr-91-25.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO.91 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.243 OF 2022 Laxmi Dental Export Pvt Ltd.
...Plaintiff
Versus
Yogesh Bagul & Ors ...Defendants ---- Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w Mr. Aman Marwah i/b Induslaw for Plaintiff. Mr. Ramesh Dube Patil, Mr. Ashish Gabhale, Ms Iraa Dubepatil i/b Jay & Co.for Defendant Nos.1 & 5.
Mr. Anuj Tiwari for Defendant No.2.
Mr. Tushar Sonawane for owner Mr. Ramvilas Lohiya. Mr. N. C. Pawar, OSD, Court Receiver present. ---- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
th MARCH 2025 DATED : 4 P.C. :
The Court Receiver was appointed by an order dated 28 th April 2022, pursuant to which, the Court Receiver had proceeded to take possession of certain impugned products, machinery and items from the defendants. The said products are presently sealed and seized in the various premises. The Court Receiver has filed the captioned report, i.e., Court Receiver Report No.91 of 2025, in which the court receiver has sought the following directions; that one of the premises at which the said seized material is lying is Unit No.497/1 at Lohiya Compound as more particularly mentioned in the site report submitted by the Additional Special Meera Jadhav
2/2 5-crr-91-25.doc Receiver who had helped the Court Receiver in implementing the order dated 28 th April 2022. Submissions that the premises in question namely, Unit No.497/1 at Lohiya compound is the premises taken on licence and it is thus by way the present report the relevant directions are sought to move those seized goods lying at the said premises to hand over the said seized goods to the plaintiff on superdari. There is today no opposition to this court receiver report as in my view there cannot be. All that is being done is for moving the location of the said seized products, machinery and items and, therefore no party can have any objection to this. In view thereof, the Court Receiver Report is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
The necessary cost, charges and expenses shall be borne by the plaintiff at this stage.
Since the goods are lying in Nashik, the aforesaid exercise can be undertaken by the plaintiff for which the plaintiff is granted a time of three weeks from today.
The Court Receiver Report is accordingly disposed of. (ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) Meera Jadhav