The Moksh v. Abdul Kayyum Shaikh

1/2 913-IA(L)-31520-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 31520 OF 2025 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.605 OF 2025 The Moksh ...Applicant/Plaintiff

Versus

Abdul Kayyum Shaikh ...Defendant ----- Mr. Vinod Bhagat a/w Ms. Sonam Pradhan i/b Vinod Bhagat for Plaintiff. Mr. Yash Kataria i/b Tofik Patel, Kajal Sarvaiya for the Defendants. ----- CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

th OCTOBER, 2025.

DATE : 17 P.C:

1.

Learned counsel for the parties have today tendered consent terms by which it is submitted that all the disputes and differences between the parties in the Captioned Commercial IP Suit have been amicably resolved. The execution of the consent terms is duly supported by the report of the Associate of this Court which reads thus:

"The signatories have admitted the contents of the Consent Terms. The consent terms are duly signed by the parties out of their free will without any undue influence and coercion. The consent terms are duly executed by the signatories."

Vaibhav

2/2 913-IA(L)-31520-2025.doc 2.

Having due regard to the fact that the consent terms have been duly executed. The same are marked "X" and taken on record. 3.

A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as the second order in the matter. The Registry is to ensure that the hard copy of the signed Consent Terms is permanently retained on file as part of the record and is not sent for destruction in the ordinary course. 4.

All pending applications are disposed of.

5.

Refund of Court fees as per rule.

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.] Vaibhav