Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Yes Bank Ltd

7.IA-349.25.DOCX ppn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.01.05 15:31:01 +0530 PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR INTERIM APPLICATION NO.349 OF 2025 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.35591 OF 2024 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Mumbai ... Applicant/ Appellant

Versus

Yes Bank Ltd.

... Respondent ______________________________________________________ Mr. N.C. Mohanty for the Applicant/Appellant. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the respondent.

______________________________________________________ CORAM : M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.

DATED : 5 January 2026 PC:- 1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 80 days in instituting the appeal.

3.

The delay in instituting this appeal is properly explained. Upon perusing the cause shown, we are satisfied that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, same is sufficient.

4.

Accordingly, we condone the delay and dispose of this Interim Application.

5.

Registry should now number the appeal and place the appeal for 'Admission' in its turn.

7.IA-349.25.DOCX 6.

Learned counsel for the appellant states that the office objections, if any, would be cleared within four weeks from today. This statement is accepted.

(Jitendra Jain, J) (M.S. Sonak, J)