Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 5 Mumbai v. The Great Eastern Shipping Co Ltd Ay 2015 16 ITA 1795 Mum 2019
2026:BHC-OS:132-DB Sayyed 26 & 28-IA.937-947.2025.docx IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2025 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.937 OF 2025 IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1581 OF 2025 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1581 OF 2025 Pr. Commissioner of Income Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai Tax-5, Mumbai ...
...Applicant/Appellant Applicant/Appellant
Versus
Versus
The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.
The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.
...
...Respondent
Respondent AND AND INTERIM APPLICATION NO.947 OF 2025 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.947 OF 2025 IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1443 OF 2025 INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1443 OF 2025 Pr. Commissioner of Income Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai Tax-5, Mumbai ...
...Applicant/Appellant Applicant/Appellant
Versus
Versus
The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.
The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd.
...Respondent
...Respondent
_____________________________________________________ Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani for the Applicant/Appellant in both IAs. Mr. Vikas T. Khanchandani for the Applicant/Appellant in both IAs. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent in both IAs. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent in both IAs. _____________________________________________________ CORAM :
M. S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ.
DATED : 6 January 2026 PC.:- 1.
Heard Mr. Khanchandani for the Applicant and Mr. Jasani for Heard Mr. Khanchandani for the Applicant and Mr. Jasani for the Respondent.
the Respondent.
2.
These Interim Applications seek condonation of delay of 130 These Interim Applications seek condonation of delay of 130 and 129 days respectively in instituting the appeals. and 129 days respectively in instituting the appeals. 3.
On perusing the averments in paragraphs 4 to 6, we are On perusing the averments in paragraphs 4 to 6, we are satisfied that the sufficient cause has been made out. Accordingly, upon satisfied that the sufficient cause has been made out. Accordingly, upon
Sayyed 26 & 28-IA.937-947.2025.docx considering the cause shown, we condone the delay and dispose of considering the cause shown, we condone the delay and dispose of these Interim Applications.
these Interim Applications.
4.
For the above, we draw sustenance from the orders made by For the above, we draw sustenance from the orders made by us disposing of Interim Application No.736 of 2025 and connected us disposing of Interim Application No.736 of 2025 and connected matters.
matters.
5.
Mr.
Mr. Khanchandani Khanchandani states that the office objections will be states that the office objections will be cleared within four weeks from today. Upon such clearance, place the cleared within four weeks from today. Upon such clearance, place the appeals for 'Admission'.
appeals for 'Admission'.
6.
The Interim Applications are disposed of in the above terms. The Interim Applications are disposed of in the above terms. (Jitendra Jain, J.) (M. S. Sonak, J.) Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/01/2026 18:28:10