← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/1995/2025disposed off

Sachin Ravindra Patange And ORS v. Shree Sai Sagar Consultants And ORS

2025-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain2 pages

HMK 1 901. COMS-141 of 2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2025.10.03 10:14:43 +0530 PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.141 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.8529 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1995 OF 2025 Sachin Ravindra Patange & Ors.

...Applicants/Plaintiffs

Versus

Shree Sai Sagar Consultants & Ors.

...Defendants WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.35140 OF 2022 Shree Sai Sagar Consultants ...Applicants

Versus

Sachin Ravindra Patange & Ors.

...Respondents

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.34056 OF 2022 Prakash Gothivarekar & Ors.

...Applicants

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Sachin Ravindra Patange & Ors.

...Plaintiffs

Versus

Shree Sai Sagar Consultants & Ors.

...Defendants __________________________________________________________________ Adv. Jahan Ara Sarkhot i/by Adv. Devashree D. Raut for the Plaintiffs. Adv. Shrey Shah i/by Hudda & Associates for the Defendant No.1. Plaintiff No.1 is present in the Court.

__________________________________________________________________ CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.

DATED : 01st October 2025

HMK 2 901. COMS-141 of 2022.doc P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the Plaintiffs on instructions from her client states that the dispute in the present suit has been resolved by the parties and, therefore, seeks liberty to withdraw the suit unconditionally. 2.

The request is accepted. The suit is allowed to be withdrawn. 3.

Refund of Court fees, as per rules.

4.

Consequently, the Interim Applications therein do not survive and are disposed of.

(JITENDRA JAIN, J.)